In my personal experience has happened several times that the tasks are essentially identical examined and found very different.
all know that the state exam takes place in a very special atmosphere, 2000, and pass people all grouped into one large room which may be the Palastampa of Turin. In this case, the bench is close to less than 3 cm from their space. The stalls where you perform the tasks because they are small and very close to each other.
solutions of the tasks can be found on the codes that come regularly to the state exam, stamped endorsed by the committee. It is useless to take where to copy the manuals or texts with the views already put forward, if you are found over the figure of shit it is excluded.
They say that persons who have already successfully copied the manual task to be undertaken with advice has been rejected by voting below the threshold of promotion.
Unfortunately we find ourselves in situations where the examiners are in correcting more than 6000 tasks (2000x3) that good or bad they all say the same thing. According to ruling of the Cassation number, so we conclude that the proposed event will be resolved as follows.
In this case, I noticed a simple thing, let's get in the shoes of the examiner that there is a task exactly the same as another. Same understood not so much with semicolons and letters but in substance.
imagine that this situation is repeated hundreds of times, you understand that, although humanly an attempt to try to be objective, it will have to consider the first task seen as sufficient and the other slightly lower. It is sad to see whose it is and also touched me.
need is to find a system of preparation of the task, being different, and not get bored in part amazes me. But now a system that gives the impression that the writer has understood the problem. But we are careful not to overdo it and not fall under the sign of identification.
The advice I have just described assumes that the proposed solutions to the legal problem with the track of the task can be defined, interpreted and resolved with the solution to these codes annotated with case law and therefore a solution well or badly argued by most candidates.
0 comments:
Post a Comment