Before the examination was reminded of the fateful question: How do I prepare for me to say?
answer to this question is not there. Or rather, there is no course that is capable of using a foolproof method, or rather no course you could explain exactly what will be the same yardstick that will use the Commissioners consideration.
There is not even a single yardstick of what is "identifying marks" that may lead to cancellation of the test, except of course the most obvious sign as the task or use multiple pens of different colors. Example of uncertainty is typical of people like me have a pleasant and would like to write bad print or at least in capital italics. For some commissioners, print is a sign of identification.
At this point we return to the original question or the courses are pre-exam?
analyze them first, sti courses. They are generally divided into theory and practice. Theory is a remake of university courses, with some ruling more or give some specific issue, perhaps of interest, but that almost certainly will not be subject to examination. Some lessons are for the job, even for the other, most not so good for the exam.
The practice is much more useful, in fact takes the form of pseudo-examination with the prospect of a track from which single out an opinion or an act. These exercises are very useful, not so much to know if you are sufficient or not the course but to join the order of ideas in the drafting of an opinion and, in the case of an act, an act of drawing the old fashioned way with pen and paper. The computer
damn much, copy and paste are detrimental not only to work every day but especially for the state exam.
How many candidates would be able to write to memory a proxy or an attorney to fight better? Few and the many I would put it even before I start writing by hand acts.
Now I use Dragon Naturally Speaking 10, and then I speak and write the computer, but I have already passed the exam. First it was a must pen and paper and sometimes someone in the studio are angry because I delivered last acts, the important thing is not the time to expire.
If I can give advice, therefore, participate in courses where there are plenty of written evidence and, if you want to avoid any theoretical lesson, go ahead. The rapporteur does not take offense, he knows that he must take lessons to lengthen the course. Ops are not very politically correct, but amen.
